top of page
Reflections on the FDA’s Decision on RP-1: Navigating the Complex Path Toward a Melanoma Cure
by: OcularCancer.com
July 24, 2025
2 Minute Read

On July 22, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Complete Response Letter rejecting Replimune’s Biologics License Application (BLA) for RP1 in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma. According to Replimune, the FDA cited concerns regarding the design of the IGNYTE trial, specifically noting the lack of a well-controlled study structure and insufficient patient population diversity.
Reflections on the FDA’s Decision on RP-1: Navigating the Complex Path Toward a Melanoma Cure
Published: July 23, 2025 | By: OcularCancer.com
On July 22, 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Complete Response Letter rejecting Replimune’s Biologics License Application (BLA) for RP1 in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma.
According to Replimune, the FDA cited concerns regarding the design of the IGNYTE trial, specifically noting the lack of a well-controlled study structure and insufficient patient population diversity.
In response, the company announced plans to request a Type A meeting with the FDA within 30 days to discuss next steps and a potential regulatory path forward. Following the announcement, Replimune’s stock fell approximately 75%.
The recent decision by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) not to approve Replimune’s RP-1 therapy for advanced melanoma has understandably stirred disappointment among patients, researchers, developers, and investors alike.
This setback, while frustrating, underscores the complexity of cancer drug development and the rigorous standards that guide regulatory decisions intended to protect patient safety and ensure efficacy.
The melanoma community of patients, advocates, clinicians, and scientists, will certainly remain steadfast in its mission: to discover and deliver safe, effective treatments and, ultimately, a cure. Each development in the research landscape, whether forward or backward, contributes to the broader understanding of how best to treat this aggressive disease.
While the FDA’s decision may feel disheartening to many, it is crucial that we continue to uphold transparency and scientific integrity throughout the process. Clear communication of clinical trial data, patient populations, disease states, and regulatory feedback allows for informed dialogue and progress based on evidence rather than emotion. In an era of passionate discourse and rapid information sharing, we must be careful not to let volume or popularity replace rigorous analysis and thoughtful deliberation.
This moment calls for continued support of those working tirelessly at the front lines of melanoma research. Progress is rarely linear, but each step, successful or not, brings us closer to the breakthroughs patients urgently need.
bottom of page